Pick 2–4 games to see their fairness metrics side by side. Highlighted rows mark fields where the operators declare different values — these are the places worth a closer read.
| Field | BC.Game CrashWATCHLIST | BC.Game LimboWATCHLIST |
|---|---|---|
| Operator | BC.Game | BC.Game |
| Declared RTP | 99.00% | 99.00% |
| House edge | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| Provably fair | Yes | Yes |
| Hash algorithm● | SHA-256 (pre-committed chain, 10M outcomes revealed in reverse) | HMAC-SHA-256 (operator-documented derivation) |
| Launched | 2017 | 2019 |
| Current status | watchlist | watchlist |
| Evidence tier |
Comparison fields show operator-declared figures (e.g. published RTP, documented hash algorithm) and Clash Watchdog AI audit state. They do not yet show observed RTP from our own data — that column is added per game once the first audit clears the minimum-sample threshold in our methodology §2.3.
| Tier 1 |
| Tier 1 |
| Last audit | — | — |
|---|
Rows highlighted with ● contain values that differ across the selected games. Differences described above are operator-declared figures, not Clash Watchdog AI audit findings — see each game page for audit status.